We’ve been examining in this series possible answers to the question of why millions of American Evangelicals have produced so little quality art of any kind, and have seen that this is to a large extent due to a limited (or distorted) view of Biblical teaching (and/or a failure to act on or consider the implications of its teaching), even though Scripture instructs Christians in “every good work” (2 Tim 3:16-17), which includes making art.

We’ve explored the destructive effects of distorted or shallow views of the Doctrines of Creation and Eschatology, which lead to devaluations of the material world and of time as the arenas of God’s Purposes, resulting in pessimism concerning history and matter as being Satan’s domain which needs to be escaped from, rather than fulfilled and redeemed. 

We saw that sub-Scriptural views of the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity as rejections or misunderstandings of the Three Persons of the One God destroy the possibilities of Scriptural justifications of seeing symbols as being revelatory of multiple meanings and unified meaning simultaneously.

Such a denigrated perspective on the Trinity leads as well to confused ideas about the reflected Mystery of God in men, seeing men as simplistic machines subject to quick-fix techniques, and who exist primarily for one mode of being, rather than complex, nuanced creatures capable of reflecting God in multi-faceted ways, resulting in an over-simplistic representation in our art-forms.

Having looked cursorily at the results of the distortion of these Doctrines, we turn now to begin a consideration of the implications of the Doctrine of the Incarnation of Christ, which teaches, in the words of the Definition of the Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451) (which sums up Biblical teaching), that Jesus Christ was “at once complete in Godhead and complete in manhood, truly God and truly man…recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God the Word, Lord Jesus Christ; even as the prophets from earliest times spoke of Him, and our Lord Jesus Christ Himself taught us, and the creed of the fathers has handed down to us.”

Christ Jesus was both fully God and fully Man at the same time, with no confusion between His Natures, both of Which co-inhered in a great Mystery to form His One Person. Such an idea was radical at the time of His Birth in the ancient Classical world, since the dominant world-view of the era (neo-Platonism) held that it was impossible for the spiritual God to have any contact with physical matter.     

This was because God was not seen as the Creator of matter, and the physical was believed to have been made by an evil being (or to be an illusion). This fueled a perspective on the physical which saw it as a highly inappropriate medium for spiritual expression.

The Incarnation of Christ, in which God (in His Second Person) joined Himself to a human body, soul, and spirit, means that God is not opposed to matter, since He assumed a physical Body forever (John 1:14; 20:24-29; 1 Cor 15:12-23; Eph 1:19-23).

This is good news for Christian artists (and thus for all artists), since the Incarnation means that not only is matter fit for spiritual expression, but that such an expression is the highest potential for matter (indeed, that matter inescapably involves spiritual expression). The fact that the Spiritual God is forever joined to the Matter of Christ’s Physical Body is an eternal refutation of all dualistic views which set at variance spirit and matter (Lord willing, we’ll look at more on this later).

The Incarnation guarantees the suitability of matter for spiritual expression, demonstrating Biblical claims that physical things are the proper arena for spirituality (Rom12:1-2; etc.), including, of course, the arts. A defective view of Christ’s Incarnation leads to a devaluation of matter as a suitable material for spiritual expression, and of matter’s value altogether.        

For additional teaching on the relationship of the physical and spiritual, listen to “Windows To Glory” series on Patreon.

A helpful book on this topic:

On the Incarnation by Saint Athanasius